Readers may know Hannah Johnson chiefly as “Black Hannah” from later North Tonawanda ghost stories. This collection of court records shows the historical conflict behind the legend.

The case grew out of John and Hannah Johnson’s struggle to hold the twelve-acre home they believed John had bought from Dr. Jesse F. Locke in Wheatfield, New York. After Locke died without a will, his estate, heirs, tenants, and later purchaser John Fonner treated the Johnson place as something smaller and weaker than the Johnsons said it was: not twelve acres bought, paid for, and improved, but a shanty and a one-acre sufferance. The resulting lawsuit pulled neighbors, relatives, lawyers, estate men, tenants, tax collectors, and the Johnsons themselves into sworn testimony before E. C. Sprague, the court-appointed referee, beginning in 1870. Most witnesses were examined live; Peltiah Hill’s testimony came in as a written conditional deposition.

What emerges is not only a land case, but a dense local drama: memory against paperwork, racial contempt against neighborly courage, legal maneuvering against long possession, and John and Hannah Johnson insisting that the place was theirs.

The sections below follow the printed packet’s order. Use the table of contents to jump to a document section, then open any page image in its own viewer.

Document sections

Front matter and printed index

Front matter scans 1–5

Notebook notes, the Court of Appeals title page, and the printed index to the case. These pages are unnumbered front matter in the scan, so they are not counted as packet pages.

↑ Back to top

Pleadings: summons, complaint, and answer

Packet pp. 1–13 · scans 6–18

The summons, complaint, answer, and certifications that frame the dispute before testimony begins. Because the scan includes five front-matter images, packet page 1 appears as scan page 6.

↑ Back to top

Referee report and findings

Packet pp. 13–16 · scans 18–21

E. C. Sprague’s report and findings. This section begins on the lower part of packet page 13, which also contains the end of the answer certification.

↑ Back to top

Judgment, substitution, and notice of appeal

Packet pp. 17–21 · scans 22–26

The judgment entered on the referee’s report, the order substituting John Chadwick after Johnson’s death, and the notice of appeal to General Term.

↑ Back to top

Trial testimony — plaintiff witnesses

Packet pp. 22–37 · scans 27–42

The Johnson-side proof begins on packet page 22 with surveyor Jesse P. Haines. It continues through Johnson’s recalled tax testimony before the plaintiff rests near the bottom of packet page 37.

↑ Back to top

Trial testimony — defendant witnesses

Packet pp. 37–78 · scans 42–83

The Fonner and Locke-heir side begins with John Fonner at the bottom of packet page 37 and continues through the defense witness run. The main run is fully underway on packet page 38.

↑ Back to top

Rebuttal, recalls, and additional proof

Packet pp. 78–110 · scans 83–115

Further proof after the initial defense witness run, including recalled witnesses, character testimony, tax evidence, exhibit references, and additional testimony returning to the central conflicts over possession, payment, and notice.

↑ Back to top

Referee opinion and appellate rulings

Packet pp. 111–126 · scans 116–131

The referee’s written opinion, later judgment and appellate material, and the notice of appeal to the Court of Appeals. This section begins on packet page 111, not scan page 111.

↑ Back to top

Addenda and exhibits

Addenda pp. 1–4 · scans 132–135

Supplemental exhibit material, including the map of Lot 10 and related papers attached after the main case text.

↑ Back to top

Peltiah Hill deposition and certification

Addenda pp. 5–14 · scans 136–145

The written conditional deposition of Peltiah Hill and related certification material. Hill’s testimony begins on the lower part of addenda page 5.

↑ Back to top

John Johnson account exhibit

Account exhibit · scans 146–148

Account material tied to Johnson’s labor and dealings with Locke. These pages matter because the case was not simply about one cash payment, but also about labor, wood, services, and a running rural account.

↑ Back to top

Appellants’ Court of Appeals brief and points

Appellants’ points · scans 149–165

The Fonner-side argument to the Court of Appeals. It attacks the judgment through legal objections, especially around testimony, the alleged settlement, and whether the evidence should have supported Johnson’s claim.

↑ Back to top

Respondent’s brief and points

Respondent’s points · scans 166–172

The respondent’s answer on appeal. Chadwick’s side defends the referee’s findings and the judgment recognizing the Johnson claim to the twelve-acre parcel.

↑ Back to top